DMG Mori DMF 200|8
Key Specifications
X Travel
Y Travel
Z Travel
Max Spindle
Tool Capacity
Max Workpiece ⌀
Overview
The DMG Mori DMF 200|8 is a traveling-column 5-axis machining center designed for long parts, breaking the mold of typical trunnion-table 5-axis machines. With 2,000 mm (78.7 in) of X-axis travel, 800 mm (31.5 in) on Y, and 850 mm (33.5 in) on Z, this machine handles workpieces up to 2,300 mm (90.6 in) long and 1,050 mm (41.3 in) in diameter — territory usually reserved for horizontal boring mills or large gantry machines.
The traveling-column design moves the spindle rather than the workpiece on the X-axis, which means the table load capacity of 2,000 kg (4,409 lb) is fully available regardless of X-axis position. Maximum workpiece dimensions are 2,300 mm long, 850 mm wide, and 900 mm tall. This geometry is ideal for aerospace structural members, energy sector components, long mold bases, and defense applications.
Spindle options range from 15,000 to 20,000 RPM with up to 200 Nm of torque. The FD variant adds mill-turn capability for complete machining of long rotational parts. The tool magazine holds up to 120 pockets with maximum 400 mm tool length.
Linear motor drive options are available for the X-axis, delivering the dynamic performance needed for high-speed contouring on long parts. Control options include Siemens Sinumerik ONE and Heidenhain TNC7 under CELOS X.
The DMF 200|8 competes with machines like the Soraluce TA-A, Jobs LinX, and larger DMG Mori portal machines. It offers a compact-footprint alternative to gantry machines for long-part 5-axis work, with the FD mill-turn option adding versatility that gantry machines cannot match. Specs sourced from DMG Mori published data.
Full Specifications
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| X-Axis Travel | 2,000 mm (78.7 in) |
| Y-Axis Travel | 800 mm (31.5 in) |
| Z-Axis Travel | 850 mm (33.5 in) |
| Max Workpiece Length | 2,300 mm (90.6 in) |
| Max Workpiece Width | 850 mm (33.5 in) |
| Max Workpiece Height | 900 mm (35.4 in) |
| Max Workpiece Diameter | 1,050 mm (41.3 in) |
| Max Table Load | 2,000 kg (4,409 lb) |
| Max Spindle Speed | 15,000 - 20,000 RPM |
| Spindle Torque | Up to 200 Nm |
| Tool Capacity | Up to 120 pockets |
| Max Tool Length | 400 mm |
| Drive Type | Ball screw (linear motor optional on X-axis) |
| Design | Traveling column |
| CNC Control | Siemens Sinumerik ONE / Heidenhain TNC7 (CELOS X) |
| 2000 Mm | 78.7 in. |
| 800 Mm | 31.5 in. |
| 850 Mm | 33.5 in. |
| 1050 Mm | 41.3 in. |
| 900 Mm | 35.4 in. |
| 2000 Kg | 4409.2 lbs. |
| 2300 Mm | 90.6 in. |
| Customer Benefits | MPC Graph: aktuelle und angelernte Prozesswerte. / MPC Diagnostics: Lagerzustand, Anzahl von Stoß und Crash. |
| Customer Benefitsflexible Application Possibilitiesin Process Measurement | Left : Semi-automatic Measurement solution. / Right : Automatic measurement solution. |
Specifications sourced from us.dmgmori.com — verified 2026-03-28
Strengths & Limitations
Strengths
- 2,000 mm X-axis travel handles long parts that conventional trunnion-table 5-axis machines cannot accommodate
- Traveling-column design maintains full 2,000 kg table load regardless of X-axis position
- FD mill-turn option enables complete machining of long rotational parts in a single setup
- Up to 120-tool magazine supports complex multi-operation jobs on large workpieces
- Linear motor option on X-axis delivers dynamic performance for high-speed contouring on long parts
- Compact footprint relative to the X-axis travel compared to equivalent gantry machines
- 2,000 kg table load handles heavy aerospace billets and mold bases
Limitations
- Traveling-column design has different dynamic characteristics than fixed-column machines; contouring accuracy can vary with X-axis position
- Starting at $500K and commonly $650K+ configured, this is a significant investment
- Long-part fixturing requires careful planning to maintain accuracy across the full 2,000 mm X-axis travel
- DMG Mori service costs are premium and machine size requires on-site service for most issues
- The 800 mm Y-axis travel can be limiting for wider workpieces
Best For
Frequently Asked Questions
01
New DMF 200|8 machines price between $500,000 and $750,000 depending on spindle, control, FD option, and linear motor configuration. The FD mill-turn option adds $50,000-$70,000. The linear motor X-axis adds $30,000-$50,000.
02
In a traveling-column design, the spindle column moves along the X-axis while the workpiece stays stationary on the table. This means the table load capacity is constant regardless of X-axis position, unlike a table-moving design where the cantilevered weight changes with position. The trade-off is that the column must be very rigid to maintain accuracy at full extension.
03
Gantry machines typically offer even longer X-axis travel and better rigidity at extreme positions. The DMF 200|8 offers a smaller footprint, lower cost, and the FD mill-turn option that gantry machines cannot provide. For long parts under 2,000 mm that need both milling and turning, the DMF is the more versatile choice.
04
The linear motor X-axis provides faster rapids and better following accuracy during high-speed contouring on long parts. For shops doing finishing passes on long aerospace components where surface quality matters, the linear motor is worth the investment. For general roughing and moderate-speed work, the ball screw version is adequate.
05
FD adds a direct-drive rotary table that can spin the workpiece for turning operations. On the DMF 200|8, this enables complete machining of long rotational parts like turbine shafts and large cylinders without moving to a separate lathe.
Videos
DMG MORI
DMG MORI
DMG MORI
DMG MORI
MTDCNC
Community Discussions
Community discussion — Who is comparable to DMG Mori? : r/Machinists - Reddit
Troubleshooting and problem-solving — DMG Mori M1. Have you got one? how's it going? - Reddit
Pricing and buying discussion — Anyone have experience with DMG Mori T2 Lathes? - Reddit
Pricing and buying discussion — The truth : r/Machinists - RedditEnd mill coatings? : r/Machinists - RedditDMG Mori. Has anyone rigid tapping with these machinces?
Links to community discussions. Summaries are editorial — visit the original thread for full context.




