Amada EM-2510NT
Key Specifications
Weight
Accuracy
working area
max punching force
max stroke rate
max sheet thickness
Overview
The Amada EM-2510NT is a servo-electric CNC turret punch press that established Amada's reputation in the electric punch press market. The EM series was one of the first commercially successful servo-driven turret punches, and the 2510NT variant remains widely used in fabrication shops worldwide. It is the predecessor to the newer AE-NT line but still represents solid, proven technology.
The working area is 2,500 x 1,000 mm (98 x 39 in), handling standard-format sheets. Maximum punching force is 200 kN (22.5 tons) from the AC servo drive. The machine achieves up to 450 strokes per minute in standard punching mode and handles mild steel up to 4.5 mm (0.177 in) thick at full tonnage. The auto-index turret carries up to 44 tool stations with Amada's multi-tool holders, and indexing time is approximately 0.5 seconds.
The EM-2510NT uses Amada's 04PC control system with a 15-inch touchscreen. While not as modern as the AMNC 3i on newer machines, the 04PC is reliable and well-understood by operators and service technicians. The servo-electric drive consumes approximately 6 kW during production -- still far below hydraulic equivalents. Because thousands of these machines were sold over a production run spanning more than a decade, the used market is strong, with well-maintained machines available from $60,000-$150,000. New production has ended in favor of the AE-NT series, making the EM-2510NT primarily a used market machine now.
Full Specifications
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Working Area | 2,500 x 1,000 mm (98 x 39 in) |
| Max Punching Force | 200 kN (22.5 tons) |
| Max Stroke Rate | 450 strokes/min |
| Max Sheet Thickness | 4.5 mm (0.177 in) mild steel at full tonnage |
| Tool Stations | Up to 44 (with multi-tool holders) |
| Turret Index Time | 0.5 seconds |
| Positioning Accuracy | ±0.07 mm |
| Traverse Speed | 80 m/min |
| Drive Type | AC servo-electric |
| CNC Control | Amada 04PC (15-inch touchscreen) |
| Avg Power Consumption | 6 kW |
| Machine Weight | Approx. 14,000 kg (30,865 lbs) |
| Modelem2510ntbrandamadatypeturret Punchescontrolcontact Sales Rep | Contact Sales Rep. |
| Modelem2510ntbrandamadatypeturret Punchescontrol | Contact Sales Rep. |
| Model | EM2510NT |
| Brand | AMADA |
| Type | Turret Punches |
| Tonnage22 T Turret Stations45 Station | ControlCNC (AMADA NT) |
| Tonnage22 T | # Turret Stations45 station |
| Tonnage | 22 T |
| Turret Stations | 45 station |
| Cnc Control | CNC (AMADA NT) |
| Looking To Purchase A New Amada Em2510nt | Contact Sales Rep. |
| Listings | (5) |
| Punches Turret | 5 photosYear: 2004 |
| 13 Photos | Year: 2005 |
| 7 Photos | Video |
| 14 Photos | Year: 2004 |
| 5 Photos | Year: 2004 |
Specifications sourced from machinetools.com — verified 2026-03-28
Strengths & Limitations
Strengths
- Massive installed base means abundant used machines, parts availability, and experienced service technicians
- 200 kN punching force is generous for a medium-format machine -- handles substantial forming operations
- Servo-electric drive at 6 kW is far more efficient than the hydraulic turret punches it replaced
- 44 tool stations with multi-tool holders provide excellent tool capacity for diverse production
- Proven reliability over a 10+ year production run -- shops run these machines for decades with proper maintenance
- Used pricing of $60,000-$150,000 makes it accessible for smaller shops entering CNC punching
Limitations
- New production has ended -- buying new is no longer an option, limiting this to the used market
- 450 strokes/min is slower than current-generation machines from Amada and competitors
- 04PC control is functional but dated compared to modern touchscreen interfaces with simulation
- 4.5 mm max thickness at full tonnage is more restrictive than newer EM-ZRT and AE-NT models
- ±0.07 mm positioning accuracy is adequate but looser than current-gen machines at ±0.05 mm
Best For
Frequently Asked Questions
01
Used EM-2510NT machines typically trade between $60,000 and $150,000 depending on year, hours, condition, and included tooling. Machines from 2005-2010 with moderate hours and well-maintained servo drives are commonly available in the $80,000-$120,000 range. Earlier machines or those needing servo overhauls trade lower.
02
Yes, if the price is right and the servo drive is in good condition. The machine's fundamental technology -- servo-electric punch with auto-index turret -- remains competitive for general fabrication work. The main limitations are slower hit rate and older control compared to current machines. Budget $5,000-$15,000 for a servo drive overhaul if the machine has high hours.
03
Amada replaced the EM series with the AE-NT line, which offers faster hit rates (600 vs 450 strokes/min), improved controls (AMNC 3i vs 04PC), tighter positioning accuracy (±0.05 mm vs ±0.07 mm), and better energy efficiency. The AE-NT is the direct successor for shops buying new.
Videos
United Metals
John Taylor Engineering Services Ltd
Rhoneum Machines
Piotr Małek
Community Discussions
Community discussion — Press brake talk Trumpf, Amada etc. - Practical Machinist
Community discussion — Used Amada Press Brake controller - Practical Machinist
Community discussion — Turret punch machine Amada Aries-255 - Practical Machinist
Troubleshooting and problem-solving — AMADA Laser Blanking and Parameter Explorer ...
Options and configuration advice — amada em2510 parameter password - CNCzone
Community discussion — Amada auto index station clamp misaligned - CNCzone
Maintenance and service — Need Help! Needed: Amada Alarm Code definitions! - CNCzone
Troubleshooting and problem-solving — Experienced operator tip - Amada Vipros issue - CNCzone
Community discussion — What do you guys think of this machine? : r/machining - Reddit
Community discussion — Okuma...Love or Hate? : r/Machinists - Reddit
Community discussion — What is the Best Production NC Bandsaw? : r/Machinists - Reddit
Community discussion — benchtop lathe/mill recommendations? : r/Machinists - Reddit
Links to community discussions. Summaries are editorial — visit the original thread for full context.



