Industrial CNC Machine Directory
MachineTool Index

Machine Comparison

GF DMP Factory 350 vs GF DMP Factory 500

GF Machining Solutions vs GF Machining Solutions · Metal Additive Manufacturing

01

Summary

The GF DMP Factory 350 and GF DMP Factory 500 are both metal powder-bed production systems with automated powder handling, but they serve different jobs. The Factory 350 is the mid-format machine, offered with one, two or three 500 W fiber lasers. The Factory 500 is the large-format machine for parts that exceed mid-format build volumes, and it comes with three 500 W lasers with full-field access.

The Factory 350 lists tighter repeatability, 60 um (3 sigma) in X, Y and Z against 75um. The Factory 500 offers the wider layer range, adjustable from 2 um to 200 um with 60 um typical, against a 5 um minimum and typical layers of 30, 60 or 90 um on the Factory 350.

02

Specifications Comparison

Specification GF DMP Factory 350 GF DMP Factory 500
Repeatability 60 um (3 sigma) in X, Y, Z ▲ Δx (3σ) = 75um, Δy (3σ) = 75um, Δz (3σ) = 75um
Laser Source Fiber laser, 1070 nm wavelength 3 x 500 W / Fiber laser
Laser Power 1x, 2x, or 3x 500 W 3x 500 W (full-field access)
Layer Thickness Adjustable, min 5 um; typical 30, 60, 90 um Adjustable, min 2 um, max 200 um; typical 60 um
03

Advantages

GF DMP Factory 350

  • 60 um (3 sigma) repeatability in X, Y and Z against 75um
  • Laser count configurable as one, two or three 500 W fiber lasers to match volume

GF DMP Factory 500

  • Three 500 W fiber lasers with full-field access
  • Layer thickness adjustable from 2 um up to 200 um, against a 5 um minimum
  • Large-format platform for parts that exceed mid-format build volumes
04

Verdict

Choose by part size. The GF DMP Factory 500 is for aerospace, space propulsion, energy and defense parts too large for a mid-format chamber, where three full-field 500 W lasers keep large builds moving. The GF DMP Factory 350 suits serial production of smaller parts such as implants, brackets and motorsport components, where its 60 um repeatability and a laser count matched to volume make more sense.