SLM Solutions SLM 280
Key Specifications
build volume
laser
build rate
layer thickness
materials
Overview
The original SLM 280 established SLM Solutions in metal AM. 280 x 280 x 365 mm, single 400W or 700W laser. One of the most widely adopted mid-size systems.
Open architecture for parameter development. Build rate ~20-35 cm³/hr. No longer in production.
Strong used market. Materials: AlSi10Mg, Ti6Al4V, IN718, 316L, CoCr, H13.
Used: $150K-$400K.
Full Specifications
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Build Volume | 280 x 280 x 365 mm |
| Laser | 1 x 400W or 700W |
| Build Rate | 20-35 cm³/hr |
| Layer Thickness | 20-75 µm |
| Materials | AlSi10Mg, Ti6Al4V, IN718, 316L, CoCr, H13 |
Specifications sourced from nikon-slm-solutions.com — verified 2026-03-28
Strengths & Limitations
Strengths
- Global installed base
- Open architecture
- 280mm generous for class
- Strong used market
- Proven across many apps
- Good entry point
Limitations
- Discontinued
- Single laser slow
- Older gas flow
- Post-processing
- Decreasing support
- No modern monitoring
Best For
Frequently Asked Questions
01
No. Used: $150K-$400K.
02
2.0: better optics, gas, UI.
03
Ongoing but may decrease.
04
20-35 cm³/hr.
05
Best used option for entering metal AM.
Videos
Nikon SLM Solutions
Design World
Top 3D Shop Inc.
Nikon SLM Solutions
Nikon SLM Solutions
Community Discussions
Community discussion — Help with Weiler LZ 280 - Practical Machinist
Owner experience and review — DMG Mori Experiences and Impressions - Practical Machinist
Community discussion — DMG MORI, Gildemeister, Maho CNC - Practical Machinist
Troubleshooting and problem-solving — Sqt15ms: 260 slideway lubrication alarm - Practical Machinist
Community discussion — SIEMENS -> Sinumerik 802D/808D/810D/828D/840D - CNCzone
Community discussion — Sinumerik Powerline or Solutionline - cnczone.com
Options and configuration advice — Light Machine Corp CNC Lathe - CNCzone
Troubleshooting and problem-solving — 810D Error Alarm 300500 - No NC ready - CNCzone
Links to community discussions. Summaries are editorial — visit the original thread for full context.




