HP Metal Jet S100
Key Specifications
build volume
layer thickness
laser power
number of lasers
build rate
sintering shrinkage
Overview
The HP Metal Jet S100 is HP's production-scale metal binder jetting system, launched as the company's entry into industrial metal additive manufacturing following the success of its Multi Jet Fusion polymer platform. Binder jetting is fundamentally different from laser powder bed fusion: instead of melting metal powder with a laser, the S100 deposits a liquid binding agent onto a powder bed layer by layer to create a "green part" which is then sintered in a conventional furnace to full density. This approach enables significantly higher throughput and lower per-part cost than LPBF for medium-to-high volume production of small-to-medium metal parts.
The S100 builds on HP's proprietary 630-nozzle per inch thermal inkjet printhead technology developed for 2D printing, applying it to metal AM with thousands of nozzles depositing binder simultaneously across the full 430 × 320 × 200 mm build volume. Layer times are measured in seconds rather than the minutes required per layer in LPBF, enabling the S100 to process several kilograms of metal powder per hour. This throughput advantage makes the S100 competitive on cost-per-part for production runs that would be uneconomical on LPBF systems. Parts are printed at ambient temperature with no thermal distortion during build, eliminating the residual stress issues common to LPBF and enabling printing of thin-wall features and complex lattice structures.
Post-processing requires a debinding and sintering cycle, typically in an atmosphere-controlled tube furnace. Sintering shrinks parts uniformly by approximately 20% in all axes — a deterministic process that HP's Metal Jet software accounts for in print preparation. Final densities above 93% are achievable with standard parameters; densities approaching 97–99% are achievable with optimized schedules. HP qualifies materials through partnerships with powder suppliers including GKN Sinter Metals and Parmatech, with 316L stainless steel and 17-4PH stainless available as production materials.
HP positions the Metal Jet S100 against conventional MIM (metal injection molding) and CNC machining for production volumes of hundreds to tens of thousands of parts per year. The economics improve with part complexity: the S100's binder jetting approach carries essentially no per-part complexity penalty, while MIM tooling amortizes poorly below ~10,000 units. For precision hardware, industrial valves, dental prosthetics, automotive powertrain components, and consumer product hardware where production volumes justify the sintering infrastructure investment, the S100 offers a compelling combination of throughput, surface finish, and part density.
Full Specifications
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Build Volume | 430 × 320 × 200 mm (16.9 × 12.6 × 7.9 in) |
| Layer Thickness | 50 – 140 µm |
| Laser Power | N/A — binder jetting process (no laser) |
| Number Of Lasers | N/A — binder jetting process |
| Build Rate | Up to 2,800 cm³/hr (green part volume) |
| Sintering Shrinkage | Approx. 20% uniform (X, Y, Z) |
| Final Part Density | 93–99% (process dependent) |
| Supported Materials | 316L stainless steel, 17-4PH stainless steel (additional alloys in qualification) |
| Accuracy | ±0.3% or ±0.2 mm (whichever is greater, post-sinter) |
| Surface Finish | Ra 4–8 µm as-sintered (up to Ra 0.8 µm with post-processing) |
| Printhead Technology | HP thermal inkjet, 630 nozzles per inch |
| Software | HP Metal Jet Software Suite |
| Machine Weight | Approx. 3,200 kg printer; sintering furnace sold separately |
Strengths & Limitations
Strengths
- Binder jetting build rate up to 2,800 cm³/hr dramatically outpaces LPBF for production volumes of small-to-medium stainless steel parts
- No laser and ambient-temperature printing eliminate residual stress and thermal distortion issues common to LPBF builds
- Part density approaching 97–99% after sintering is competitive with MIM and significantly better than early binder jetting systems
- HP inkjet printhead technology with thousands of simultaneous nozzles provides consistent binder deposition across the full build area
Limitations
- Two-step process (print then sinter) adds furnace capital cost, lead time, and process management complexity versus single-step LPBF
- Approximately 20% sintering shrinkage requires careful design compensation and limits achievable tolerance without post-machining
- Material library currently limited to 316L and 17-4PH stainless steel — aerospace-critical alloys like titanium and Inconel not yet available
Best For
Frequently Asked Questions
01
Binder jetting deposits a liquid binding agent onto metal powder rather than melting it with a laser. The bound 'green part' is then sintered in a furnace to achieve full density. This enables much higher throughput than LPBF and lower per-part cost at volume, but requires a separate sintering step and produces approximately 20% shrinkage. LPBF produces fully dense parts directly from the printer but is slower and more expensive per part at production volumes.
02
HP currently qualifies 316L stainless steel and 17-4PH stainless steel for the Metal Jet S100. HP has announced intent to expand the material library, but as of early 2026, stainless steels are the primary production materials. This limits the S100's applicability for aerospace and high-temperature applications that require titanium, Inconel, or other specialty alloys.
03
The S100 printer produces green parts that require sintering in a controlled-atmosphere tube furnace. HP partners with furnace suppliers but the furnace is not bundled with the printer. Customers typically invest $150,000–$400,000 in sintering infrastructure depending on throughput requirements. HP provides sintering schedules and temperature profiles for qualified materials.
Videos
Manufacturing Technology Centre
HP
HP
HP
HP
Community Discussions
Community discussion — Read this if you are considering a Jet ZX series lathe…
Community discussion — Jet 1024/1236 | Practical ...
Comparison and buying advice — Buying new lathe, Sharp vs Jet? - Practical Machinist
Community discussion — Hyster S100 LPG Vaporizer/Regulator Help Needed
Community discussion — What does everyone see as the most trusted CNC ... - Reddit
Owner experience and review — Water jet recommendations? : r/Machinists - Reddit
Pricing and buying discussion — Honest opinions on Jet lathes, mills and saws? :
Owner experience and review — Opinions on JET? Lathes, mills etc.. : r/Machinists - Reddit
Links to community discussions. Summaries are editorial — visit the original thread for full context.




