Machine Comparison
Okuma MULTUS B200II vs Starrag Bumotec s191H
Okuma vs Starrag · Mill-Turn Machines
Summary
The Okuma MULTUS B200II and the Starrag Bumotec s191H are both mill-turn machines, but the makers publish few comparable figures for this pair: the table has a single row, tool capacity. On that row the Starrag Bumotec s191H carries 90 positions against 20 tools on the Okuma MULTUS B200II, 4.5 times as many.
Beyond that one figure, the two are described for different work. The Okuma MULTUS B200II suits small shafts and bar parts turned and milled in one setup, with a second-spindle specification that can be ordered for two-ended parts. The Starrag Bumotec s191H suits small complex parts machined complete from bar, fine milling and engraving with small tools, and long bar-fed runs.
Specifications Comparison
| Specification | Okuma MULTUS B200II | Starrag Bumotec s191H |
|---|---|---|
| Tool Capacity | 20 tools | 90 positions ▲ |
Advantages
Okuma MULTUS B200II
- Described for small shafts and bar parts turned and milled in one setup
- A second-spindle specification can be ordered for two-ended parts
Starrag Bumotec s191H
- 90 tool positions against 20 tools, 4.5 times as many
- Described for fine milling and engraving with small tools on parts machined complete from bar
- Keeps many tools loaded for long bar-fed runs
Verdict
The table supports one conclusion: a part family that needs many tools loaded at once fits the Starrag Bumotec s191H, with 90 positions against 20 tools. For the rest, choose by the work. Small complex bar parts with fine milled and engraved features point to the Starrag Bumotec s191H; small shafts and bar parts turned and milled in one setup, or two-ended work on the second-spindle version, point to the Okuma MULTUS B200II.