Machine Comparison
Okuma 2SP-2500H vs Okuma 2SP-V40
Okuma vs Okuma · CNC Lathes
Summary
The Okuma 2SP-2500H and Okuma 2SP-V40 are both from Okuma's cnc lathes lineup, making this a common upgrade or lineup decision for shops already invested in the Okuma ecosystem. The Okuma 2SP-V40 leads in rapid traverse (30 m/min (X and Z) vs 25 m/min X, 30 m/min Z). The Okuma 2SP-V40 leads in chuck size (315 mm (12.4 in) hydraulic vs 10 in (250 mm)). The Okuma 2SP-V40 shows specification advantages in 4 categories, though the Okuma 2SP-2500H may still be the better choice depending on your shop's specific needs and the type of work you run. Both machines are proven performers in production environments and represent solid investments for shops in the market for a cnc lathe.
Specifications Comparison
| Specification | Okuma 2SP-2500H | Okuma 2SP-V40 |
|---|---|---|
| Rapid Traverse | 25 m/min X, 30 m/min Z | 30 m/min (X and Z) ▲ |
| Chuck Size | 10 in (250 mm) | 315 mm (12.4 in) hydraulic ▲ |
| Max Turning Diameter | 340 mm (13.4 in) | 400 mm (15.7 in) per spindle ▲ |
| Control | Okuma OSP-P300L | Okuma OSP-P300L |
| Machine Weight | 5,600 kg (12,346 lb) | 14,000 kg (30,864 lb) ▲ |
| Price Range | $190,000 - $280,000 ▲ | $500,000 - $700,000 |
Advantages
Okuma 2SP-2500H
- More competitive pricing at $190,000 - $280,000 compared to $500,000 - $700,000
- Backed by Okuma's dealer and service network for parts and support
- Automotive production of mid-size components like brake rotors, hubs, and bearing housings requiring front-and-back machining
Okuma 2SP-V40
- Faster rapid traverse at 30 m/min (X and Z) reduces non-cutting time between operations
- Superior chuck size at 315 mm (12.4 in) hydraulic vs 10 in (250 mm)
- Superior max turning diameter at 400 mm (15.7 in) per spindle vs 340 mm (13.4 in)
- Superior machine weight at 14,000 kg (30,864 lb) vs 5,600 kg (12,346 lb)
Verdict
The Okuma 2SP-V40 edges ahead on specifications in this comparison, particularly in Rapid Traverse and Chuck Size. However, the Okuma 2SP-2500H remains competitive and may be the better choice depending on price, dealer support in your area, or specific workholding and tooling considerations. Both are capable machines — the best decision comes from running your actual parts and evaluating total cost of ownership including tooling, training, and service.