Machine Comparison
Mazak INTEGREX e-500H vs Mazak INTEGREX e-H
Yamazaki Mazak vs Yamazaki Mazak · Mill-Turn Machines
Summary
The Mazak INTEGREX e-500H and Mazak INTEGREX e-H are both from Yamazaki Mazak's mill-turn machines lineup, making this a common upgrade or lineup decision for shops already invested in the Yamazaki Mazak ecosystem. These machines are closely matched across most specifications, making the decision more about specific feature priorities, dealer support, and your existing shop ecosystem than raw spec advantages. Both machines are proven performers in production environments and represent solid investments for shops in the market for a mill-turn machine.
Specifications Comparison
| Specification | Mazak INTEGREX e-500H | Mazak INTEGREX e-H |
|---|---|---|
| Control | MAZATROL SmoothAi CNC | MAZATROL SmoothAi CNC |
| B Axis Range | 240° (-30° to +210°) | 240° (-30° to +210°) |
| C Axis Rotation | 360° continuous | 360° continuous |
| Milling Spindle Speed | 12,000 RPM | 12,000 RPM |
| Long Boring Bar | 1,000-1,500 mm max tool length | 1,000-1,500 mm max tool length |
| Price Range | $550,000 - $850,000 | $550,000 - $1,500,000+ |
Advantages
Mazak INTEGREX e-500H
- Backed by Yamazaki Mazak's dealer and service network for parts and support
- Aerospace shops machining large structural components needing turning, milling, and deep boring in one setup
Mazak INTEGREX e-H
- Backed by Yamazaki Mazak's dealer and service network for parts and support
- Aerospace OEMs machining large structural components and engine casings in single setup
Verdict
This is a close matchup. The Mazak INTEGREX e-500H and Mazak INTEGREX e-H trade advantages across different specifications, making neither a clear winner on paper alone. Your decision should come down to practical factors: which dealer is closer, which control system your operators already know, what tooling ecosystem you're invested in, and which machine's specific strengths match your highest-volume work. Get quotes on both, run test cuts with your actual parts if possible, and factor in long-term service and support costs.