Machine Comparison
Flow Mach 150 vs OMAX GlobalMax 1530
Flow International vs OMAX Corporation · CNC Waterjet
Summary
The Flow Mach 150 and the OMAX GlobalMax 1530 are both CNC waterjet cutting machines. The makers publish few comparable figures for this pair, so the table has two rows: Z-axis travel and repeatability.
On Z travel the Flow Mach 150 has 8 in (203 mm) against 5″ (127 mm) on the OMAX GlobalMax 1530, which leaves more room for thick stock and tall fixtures. Repeatability is the same on both, ± 0.001 in (± 0.025 mm). Beyond those rows, the Flow Mach 150 is listed for thick steel plate and mixed work, and the OMAX GlobalMax 1530 for sheet and light plate cut as flat stock on low fixtures.
Specifications Comparison
| Specification | Flow Mach 150 | OMAX GlobalMax 1530 |
|---|---|---|
| Z-Axis Travel | 8 in (203 mm) ▲ | 5″ (127 mm) |
| Repeatability | ± 0.001 in (± 0.025 mm) | ±0.001″ (±0.025 mm) |
Advantages
Flow Mach 150
- 8 in (203 mm) of Z travel against 5″ (127 mm)
- Listed for thick steel plate, and for mixed work where edge finish is chosen per job
OMAX GlobalMax 1530
- Listed for sheet and light plate cut from flat stock on low fixtures
- Aimed at repeat production from proven programs
Verdict
With only two comparable rows, keep the decision to what they show. If the work includes thick plate or tall fixtures, the Flow Mach 150 has the Z travel for it, 8 in (203 mm) against 5″ (127 mm). If the work is sheet and light plate on low fixtures, the OMAX GlobalMax 1530 covers it and matches the Flow Mach 150 on repeatability at ±0.001″ (±0.025 mm). Compare table size, pump and accuracy figures with both makers before deciding.