Machine Comparison
Amada EG-4010 vs Bystronic Xpress 160
Amada vs Bystronic · CNC Press Brakes
Summary
The Amada EG-4010 from Amada and Bystronic Xpress 160 from Bystronic are direct competitors in the cnc press brakes category. The Bystronic Xpress 160 shows specification advantages in 7 categories, though the Amada EG-4010 may still be the better choice depending on your shop's specific needs and the type of work you run. Both machines are proven performers in production environments and represent solid investments for shops in the market for a cnc press brake.
Specifications Comparison
| Specification | Amada EG-4010 | Bystronic Xpress 160 |
|---|---|---|
| Control | AMNC 3i (15.6-inch touchscreen) | ByVision Bending (touchscreen) |
| Press Capacity | 400 kN / 40 metric tons (45 US tons) | 1,600 kN / 160 metric tons (176 US tons) ▲ |
| Stroke | 150 mm (5.9 in) | 250 mm (9.8 in) ▲ |
| Open Height | 295 mm (11.6 in) | 550 mm (21.7 in) ▲ |
| Throat Depth | 200 mm (7.9 in) | 400 mm (15.75 in) ▲ |
| Approach Speed | 100 mm/sec (3.9 in/sec) | 150 mm/s (354 ipm) ▲ |
| Pressing Speed | 10 mm/sec (0.4 in/sec) | 10 mm/s (24 ipm) |
| Drive System | Dual AC servo electric (no hydraulics) | Hydraulic |
| Power Requirement | 200V, 8 kVA | 480V, 3-phase, 60 Hz ▲ |
| Machine Weight | 2,800 kg (6,173 lb) | ~11,500 kg (25,353 lb) ▲ |
| Price Range | $60,000 - $90,000 (new); $35,000 - $55,000 (used, 2016-2020) ▲ | $80,000 - $130,000 (new); $50,000 - $90,000 (used 2018-2022) |
Advantages
Amada EG-4010
- More competitive pricing at $60,000 - $90,000 (new); $35,000 - $55,000 (used, 2016-2020) compared to $80,000 - $130,000 (new); $50,000 - $90,000 (used 2018-2022)
- Backed by Amada's dealer and service network for parts and support
- Electronics and enclosure manufacturers bending small precise thin-gauge parts
Bystronic Xpress 160
- Superior press capacity at 1,600 kN / 160 metric tons (176 US tons) vs 400 kN / 40 metric tons (45 US tons)
- Superior stroke at 250 mm (9.8 in) vs 150 mm (5.9 in)
- Superior open height at 550 mm (21.7 in) vs 295 mm (11.6 in)
- Superior throat depth at 400 mm (15.75 in) vs 200 mm (7.9 in)
- Superior approach speed at 150 mm/s (354 ipm) vs 100 mm/sec (3.9 in/sec)
Verdict
The Bystronic Xpress 160 edges ahead on specifications in this comparison, particularly in press capacity and stroke. However, the Amada EG-4010 remains competitive and may be the better choice depending on price, dealer support in your area, or specific workholding and tooling considerations. Both are capable machines — the best decision comes from running your actual parts and evaluating total cost of ownership including tooling, training, and service.