Machine Comparison
Starrag SIP 5000 vs Starrag SIP 7000
Starrag vs Starrag · 5-Axis Machining Centers
Summary
The Starrag SIP 5000 and Starrag SIP 7000 are both from Starrag's 5-axis machining centers lineup, making this a common upgrade or lineup decision for shops already invested in the Starrag ecosystem. The Starrag SIP 7000 leads in x travel (1,200 mm (47.2 in) vs 700 mm (27.6 in)). The Starrag SIP 7000 leads in tool capacity (60 tools vs 40 tools standard (up to 120 optional)). The Starrag SIP 5000 leads in spindle power (28 kW (37.5 hp) vs 22 kW (30 hp)). The Starrag SIP 7000 shows specification advantages in 8 categories, though the Starrag SIP 5000 may still be the better choice depending on your shop's specific needs and the type of work you run. Both machines are proven performers in production environments and represent solid investments for shops in the market for a 5-axis machining center.
Specifications Comparison
| Specification | Starrag SIP 5000 | Starrag SIP 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| X-Axis Travel | 700 mm (27.6 in) | 1,200 mm (47.2 in) ▲ |
| Y-Axis Travel | 530 mm (20.9 in) | 1,000 mm (39.4 in) ▲ |
| Z-Axis Travel | 500 mm (19.7 in) | 1,000 mm (39.4 in) ▲ |
| Max Spindle Speed | 20,000 RPM | 20,000 RPM |
| Spindle Power | 28 kW (37.5 hp) ▲ | 22 kW (30 hp) |
| Tool Capacity | 40 tools standard (up to 120 optional) | 60 tools ▲ |
| Table Size | 630 x 500 mm (24.8 x 19.7 in) | 800 x 800 mm (31.5 x 31.5 in) ▲ |
| Accuracy | 0.002 mm (0.00008 in) ▲ | < 3 µm volumetric |
| Control | Heidenhain TNC 640 | Heidenhain TNC 640 |
| C Axis Range | 360° continuous | 360° continuous |
| Spindle Taper | HSK-A63 | HSK-A63 |
| Max Workpiece Weight | 500 kg (1,102 lb) | 1,000 kg (2,205 lb) ▲ |
| Machine Weight | 14,000 kg (30,865 lb) | 18,000 kg (39,683 lb) ▲ |
| Price Range | $900,000 - $1,400,000 | $800,000 - $1,200,000 ▲ |
Advantages
Starrag SIP 5000
- More spindle power at 28 kW (37.5 hp) for aggressive material removal in harder materials
- Tighter positioning accuracy at 0.002 mm (0.00008 in) for precision-critical work
- Backed by Starrag's dealer and service network for parts and support
- Aerospace OEMs machining flight-critical turbine engine components, fuel system housings, and hydraulic manifolds requiring micron-level positional accuracy and bore relationships
Starrag SIP 7000
- Greater x travel of 1,200 mm (47.2 in) accommodates larger workpieces
- Greater y travel of 1,000 mm (39.4 in) accommodates larger workpieces
- Greater z travel of 1,000 mm (39.4 in) accommodates larger workpieces
- Larger tool magazine with 60 tools capacity reduces manual tool changes on complex parts
- Superior table size at 800 x 800 mm (31.5 x 31.5 in) vs 630 x 500 mm (24.8 x 19.7 in)
Verdict
The Starrag SIP 7000 edges ahead on specifications in this comparison, particularly in X Travel and Y Travel. However, the Starrag SIP 5000 remains competitive and may be the better choice depending on price, dealer support in your area, or specific workholding and tooling considerations. Both are capable machines — the best decision comes from running your actual parts and evaluating total cost of ownership including tooling, training, and service.