Industrial CNC Machine Directory
MachineTool Index

Machine Comparison

Mazak INTEGREX AG vs Starrag Bumotec s191H

Yamazaki Mazak vs Starrag · Mill-Turn Machines

01

Summary

The Mazak INTEGREX AG and the Starrag Bumotec s191H are both mill-turn machines, aimed at very different parts. The INTEGREX AG is a gear-machining series that cuts gears in the same setup as turning; the Starrag Bumotec s191H machines small watch, medical and micro-component parts from bar stock.

The makers publish few comparable figures for this pair, so the table has three rows. The s191H runs its live tools at 40,000 RPM against 12,000 RPM on the AG, which offers 20,000 RPM as an extra-cost option on its horizontal platforms. It also has 90 positions in its tool magazine against 36-72 tools by base platform. The controls differ: Fanuc 31i-B5 against MAZATROL SmoothAi CNC with gear machining cycles.

02

Specifications Comparison

Specification Mazak INTEGREX AG Starrag Bumotec s191H
Live Tool Speed 12,000 RPM (20,000 RPM optional on horizontal) 40,000 RPM ▲
Tool Capacity 36-72 tools by base platform 90 positions ▲
Control MAZATROL SmoothAi CNC with gear machining cycles Fanuc 31i-B5
03

Advantages

Mazak INTEGREX AG

  • Gear machining cycles built into the MAZATROL SmoothAi CNC
  • Gear skiving, hobbing and end milling with on-machine measurement in the same setup as turning
  • Sized for gear blanks, from horizontal platforms up to large vertical ones

Starrag Bumotec s191H

  • Live tools at 40,000 RPM against 12,000 RPM standard, or 20,000 RPM optional, on the AG
  • 90 positions against 36-72 tools by base platform
04

Verdict

Choose the Mazak INTEGREX AG for gears and geared shafts that need turning, gear cutting and measurement in one setup. Choose the Starrag Bumotec s191H for small, complex watch, medical and micro-aerospace parts made from bar, where 40,000 RPM live tools suit small cutters and 90 positions in the magazine cover high-mix work. The two machines do not compete for the same parts.