Machine Comparison
Mazak Dual Turn 200 vs Okuma 2SP-150H
Yamazaki Mazak vs Okuma · CNC Lathes
Summary
The Mazak Dual Turn 200 from Yamazaki Mazak and Okuma 2SP-150H from Okuma are direct competitors in the cnc lathes category. The Mazak Dual Turn 200 leads in chuck size (203 mm (8 in) vs 6 in (150 mm)). These machines are closely matched across most specifications, making the decision more about specific feature priorities, dealer support, and your existing shop ecosystem than raw spec advantages. Both machines are proven performers in production environments and represent solid investments for shops in the market for a cnc lathe.
Specifications Comparison
| Specification | Mazak Dual Turn 200 | Okuma 2SP-150H |
|---|---|---|
| Rapid Traverse | 30 m/min X, 30 m/min Z | 30 m/min X, 36 m/min Z |
| Chuck Size | 203 mm (8 in) ▲ | 6 in (150 mm) |
| Max Turning Length | 150 mm (5.91 in) | 150 mm (5.9 in) |
| Control | MAZATROL SmoothG | Okuma OSP-P300L |
| Price Range | $180,000 - $280,000 | $160,000 - $240,000 ▲ |
Advantages
Mazak Dual Turn 200
- Superior chuck size at 203 mm (8 in) vs 6 in (150 mm)
- Backed by Yamazaki Mazak's dealer and service network for parts and support
- High-volume production of short turned parts like bushings, spacers, connectors
Okuma 2SP-150H
- More competitive pricing at $160,000 - $240,000 compared to $180,000 - $280,000
- Backed by Okuma's dealer and service network for parts and support
- High-volume production of small automotive components like sensor housings, valve seats, and fittings
Verdict
This is a close matchup. The Mazak Dual Turn 200 and Okuma 2SP-150H trade advantages across different specifications, making neither a clear winner on paper alone. Your decision should come down to practical factors: which dealer is closer, which control system your operators already know, what tooling ecosystem you're invested in, and which machine's specific strengths match your highest-volume work. Get quotes on both, run test cuts with your actual parts if possible, and factor in long-term service and support costs.