Machine Comparison
EMAG VSC 250 vs Junker JUMAT 3S
EMAG vs Junker Group · CNC Grinding Machines
Summary
The EMAG VSC 250 and the Junker JUMAT 3S share a grinding category but handle different parts, and the makers publish few comparable figures for this pair: the table has one row, floor space. The EMAG VSC 250 is listed for short chucked parts, with turning and bore grinding in one clamping on DS/DDS machines. The Junker JUMAT 3S is listed for shaft-type parts.
On the floor, the EMAG VSC 250 is listed at 2,400 x 4,200 x 2,750 mm (94 x 165 x 108 in). The Junker JUMAT 3S is listed at 3250 x 2250 x 2200 mm (WxDxH, without peripherals), so its figure leaves out equipment the installed machine will need. The table names no winner on this row.
Specifications Comparison
| Specification | EMAG VSC 250 | Junker JUMAT 3S |
|---|---|---|
| Floor Space | 2,400 x 4,200 x 2,750 mm (94 x 165 x 108 in) | 3250 x 2250 x 2200 mm (WxDxH, without peripherals) |
Advantages
EMAG VSC 250
- Turning and bore grinding in one clamping on DS/DDS machines
- Suited to short chucked parts rather than shafts
Junker JUMAT 3S
- Suited to shaft-type parts
- Listed for shops short on floor space, at 3250 x 2250 x 2200 mm (WxDxH, without peripherals)
Verdict
Choose by part shape. A shop turning and grinding short chucked parts in one clamping should look at the EMAG VSC 250, a listing also aimed at buyers assessing a used machine. A shop grinding shaft-type parts should look at the Junker JUMAT 3S. The floor space figures, 2,400 x 4,200 x 2,750 mm against 3250 x 2250 x 2200 mm, are not like for like because the Junker figure excludes peripherals, so plan the layout from each maker's installation drawing.