Machine Comparison
DMG Mori CMX 50 U vs Mazak HCR
DMG Mori vs Yamazaki Mazak · 5-Axis Machining Centers
Summary
The DMG Mori CMX 50 U from DMG Mori and Mazak HCR from Yamazaki Mazak are direct competitors in the 5-axis machining centers category. These machines are closely matched across most specifications, making the decision more about specific feature priorities, dealer support, and your existing shop ecosystem than raw spec advantages. Both machines are proven performers in production environments and represent solid investments for shops in the market for a 5-axis machining center.
Specifications Comparison
| Specification | DMG Mori CMX 50 U | Mazak HCR |
|---|---|---|
| Control | CELOS with Fanuc 31i-B5 or Siemens 840D sl | MAZATROL SmoothAi CNC |
| Max Workpiece Diameter | 500 mm (19.7 in) | 700 mm (27.6 in) ▲ |
| Max Workpiece Height | 350 mm (13.8 in) | 644 mm (25.3 in) ▲ |
| Price Range | $175,000 - $275,000 ▲ | $400,000 - $700,000 |
Advantages
DMG Mori CMX 50 U
- More competitive pricing at $175,000 - $275,000 compared to $400,000 - $700,000
- Backed by DMG Mori's dealer and service network for parts and support
- Job shops adding their first 5-axis capability without committing to premium pricing
Mazak HCR
- Superior max workpiece diameter at 700 mm (27.6 in) vs 500 mm (19.7 in)
- Superior max workpiece height at 644 mm (25.3 in) vs 350 mm (13.8 in)
- Backed by Yamazaki Mazak's dealer and service network for parts and support
- Aerospace manufacturers producing small complex aluminum and titanium components at high surface speeds
Verdict
This is a close matchup. The DMG Mori CMX 50 U and Mazak HCR trade advantages across different specifications, making neither a clear winner on paper alone. Your decision should come down to practical factors: which dealer is closer, which control system your operators already know, what tooling ecosystem you're invested in, and which machine's specific strengths match your highest-volume work. Get quotes on both, run test cuts with your actual parts if possible, and factor in long-term service and support costs.