Index MS 50-4 CNC Multi-Spindle Automatic Lathe
Key Specifications
Number of Spindles
Max Bar Diameter
Max Spindle Speed
Spindle Motor Power
Bar Feed Capacity
Cross Slides
Overview
The Index MS 50-4 is a compact four-spindle CNC multi-spindle automatic lathe from Index-Werke, designed for mid-volume production and shops transitioning from single-spindle turning centers to multi-spindle productivity. With a maximum bar diameter of 50 mm across four fully CNC-controlled spindle positions, the MS 50-4 occupies a productive middle ground between high-output six-spindle machines and single-spindle Swiss-type lathes, offering genuine multi-spindle throughput gains at a smaller capital investment and reduced floor space requirement.
The four-spindle configuration makes the MS 50-4 particularly well-suited for complex parts that carry many operations per piece. Where a six-spindle machine divides a complex part's operations across six positions, the four-spindle layout consolidates more operations at each position, which can actually simplify tooling and programming for parts with fewer than six distinct operation groups. This makes the MS 50-4 a natural fit for shops running medium-complexity parts in annual volumes of 50,000 to 500,000 pieces.
Index's iXpanel control on a Siemens SINUMERIK 840D sl base governs all CNC axes on the MS 50-4. Each of the four positions carries independent cross slides and end-working units, with driven tool capability available at all positions. The machine supports Index's DriveLine technology, which synchronizes spindle and feed axis movements for high-precision thread cutting and tapping without the need for a separate synchronous tapping unit.
The MS 50-4 features a notably compact machine envelope for a multi-spindle — roughly 40% smaller in footprint than Index's eight-spindle MS 52-8 — making it accessible to shops that cannot dedicate a full production cell to a larger machine. Standard equipment includes centralized automatic lubrication, coolant filtration with 80-bar through-tool high-pressure option, integrated chip conveyor, and a bar stock monitoring system. The machine is CE-marked and meets current European and North American electrical and safety standards.
Full Specifications
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Number Of Spindles | 4 |
| Max Bar Diameter | 50 mm (1.97 in) |
| Max Spindle Speed | 7,000 RPM |
| Spindle Motor Power | 30 kW (40 hp) |
| Bar Feed Capacity | 3,000 mm (118 in) bar length |
| Cross Slides | 4 cross slides + 4 end-working slides |
| Control System | Siemens SINUMERIK 840D sl (Index iXpanel) |
| Machine Weight | Approx. 9,500 kg (20,900 lb) |
| Guest Name | Dietary Restriction |
| David | None |
| Bob | None |
| Nancy | None |
| Mary | Vegetarian |
| Formula | Formula Output |
| Index | 3 |
| Goal | Formula |
| Find Marys Dietary Restriction | =INDEX(A1:D6, MATCH("Mary", A1:A6, 0), MATCH("Dietary Restriction", A1:D1, 0)) |
| Find Who Is At Table Number 2 | =INDEX(A1:D6, MATCH(2, D1:D6, 0), MATCH("Guest Name", A1:D1, 0)) |
Strengths & Limitations
Strengths
- Four-spindle layout offers multi-spindle productivity at significantly lower capital cost than six- or eight-spindle alternatives
- Compact footprint — roughly 40% smaller than six-spindle machines — fits shops with limited floor space
- Larger 50 mm bar capacity covers a wide range of components not achievable on smaller 32–36 mm class multi-spindles
- Index DriveLine synchronous tapping eliminates the need for separate tapping heads, simplifying tooling setup
Limitations
- Four working positions limit cycle time gains on simple parts — six-spindle machines will outproduce the MS 50-4 on low-operation-count parts
- 30 kW spindle motor is less suited to aggressive stock removal in large-diameter hardened steel compared to larger Index models
- Tooling investment is still substantial — quality multi-spindle tooling for a four-position setup typically runs $50,000–$150,000 per job
Best For
Frequently Asked Questions
01
The MS 50-4 is one of the more accessible multi-spindle machines for shops new to the technology. Its four-spindle layout is simpler to program and tool than six- or eight-spindle machines, and Index provides dedicated multi-spindle training at its Esslingen facility. That said, shops should plan for a 6–12 month learning curve before achieving optimal OEE on the machine.
02
The MS 50-4 uses a fixed headstock design and is optimized for shorter, chunkier parts where bar diameter is significant relative to length. Swiss-type lathes use a sliding headstock and guide bushing for long slender parts where length-to-diameter ratios exceed 3:1. The MS 50-4 will significantly outproduce a single-spindle Swiss type on short parts, but Swiss types are better suited to long precision pins and shafts.
03
Yes. The MS 50-4 is rated for stainless steel machining with appropriate tooling and high-pressure coolant. The 80-bar through-tool coolant option is strongly recommended for stainless steel to manage chip breaking and tool life. Index recommends premium carbide or cermet inserts from suppliers like Sandvik or Iscar for best results in 304 and 316L stainless.
Community Discussions
Community discussion — FUSION 360 Machine Simulation (Lathe) - Practical Machinist
Community discussion — Index position on cnc lathe | Practical ...
Options and configuration advice — Lathe live tooling - Practical Machinist
Community discussion — practical manual 4th axis/indexing for ...
Community discussion — Index and Traub - CNCzone
Options and configuration advice — Index and Traub - Page 2 - cnczone.com
Maintenance and service — Need Help! ALARM 2023 (each tool indexing is not ... - CNCzone
Community discussion — c-axis programming lathe - CNCzone
Owner experience and review — Any experience with Index multi spindle machines ... - Reddit
Owner experience and review — Have any of you ran an Index Traub 200.2? : r/Machinists - Reddit
Community discussion — If your shop had the money, what 5-axis mill and what lathe ...
Community discussion — Indexable endmill recommendations? : r/Machinists - Reddit
Links to community discussions. Summaries are editorial — visit the original thread for full context.