DN Solutions LYNX 2100 LYB
Image: dn-solutions.com, DN Solutions
Key Specifications
X Travel
Y Travel
Z Travel
Max Spindle
Spindle Power
Max Turn Length
How much does the DN Solutions LYNX 2100 LYB cost?
Estimated price range
Our best estimate for a cnc lathes / turning center in this class — not a quote from DN Solutions. Configuration moves it a long way.
Overview
The DN Solutions LYNX 2100 LYB puts a Y axis on the 8 in LYNX 2100 spindle: 105 mm (4 in) of Y travel alongside 205 mm (8 in) of X and 560 mm (22 in) of Z. The main spindle is rated 15 kW (20 hp), 169 N·m (125 ft-lb) and 4,500 rpm, and the live tools are listed at 6,000 rpm. It turns up to 300 mm (12 in) in diameter and 510 mm (20 in) in length.
The 8 in spindle matters on a Y-axis machine because of the blanks it holds. Stock large enough to need an 8 in chuck usually has real material to remove before any milling starts, and the 169 N·m (125 ft-lb) at the spindle is there for that roughing. The figure is about 33% above the 127 N·m (94 ft-lb) of the 6 in LYNX 2100 A and LYNX 2100 LA, in exchange for top speed: 4,500 rpm here against their 6,000 rpm.
Once the turning is done, the Y stroke lets driven tools work away from the centreline. On a part of this size that typically means bolt-circle holes drilled square to a milled flat, wrench flats cut to width in straight passes, or a keyway whose walls stay parallel. The stroke is 105 mm (4 in) in total, well short of the 300 mm (12 in) turning diameter, so check on the drawing that every off-centre feature of a large part falls inside it. DN Solutions' table does not say how the stroke is split either side of centre.
Against the turning-only LYNX 2100 B, which has the same chuck, speed, power and torque, this model has 560 mm (22 in) of Z travel instead of 340 mm (13 in) and weighs 3,900 kg (8,598 lb) instead of 3,100 kg (6,834 lb). The LYNX 2100 B turns a larger diameter, 350 mm (14 in), but a shorter length, 330 mm (13 in). The step up is the LYNX 2600 Y, with a 10 in chuck, 403 N·m (297 ft-lb) and the same 105 mm (4 in) of Y travel, at 5,750 kg (12,677 lb).
Plan the installation around 2,880 mm (113 in) of length, 1,711 mm (67 in) of width and 1,921 mm (76 in) of height. The live-tool drive is described by its speed alone, so heavy milling cuts should be discussed with DN before a job is quoted.
Full Specifications
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Chuck Size | 8 in |
| Max Turning Diameter | 300 mm (12 in) |
| Max Turning Length | 510 mm (20 in) |
| Rapid Traverse X | 30 m/min (1,181 ipm) |
| Rapid Traverse Z | 36 m/min (1,417 ipm) |
| X-Axis Travel | 205 mm (8 in) |
| Y-Axis Travel | 105 mm (4 in) |
| Z-Axis Travel | 560 mm (22 in) |
| Max Spindle Speed | 4,500 rpm |
| Spindle Motor Power | 15 kW (20 hp) |
| Spindle Torque | 169 N·m (125 ft-lb) |
| Turret Stations | 12 |
| Live Tool Speed | 6,000 rpm |
| Floor Space Required | 2,880 × 1,711 × 1,921 mm (113 × 67 × 76 in) |
| Machine Weight | 3,900 kg (8,598 lb) |
Specifications sourced from dn-solutions.com — verified 2026-10-02
Strengths & Limitations
Strengths
- 105 mm (4 in) of Y travel on an 8 in chuck machine, for flats, keyways and off-centre holes in the turning setup
- 169 N·m (125 ft-lb) of spindle torque, about 33% more than the 127 N·m (94 ft-lb) of the 6 in LYNX 2100 A
- Live tools run to 6,000 rpm although the main spindle tops out at 4,500 rpm, so small cutters keep their speed
- 560 mm (22 in) of Z travel and 510 mm (20 in) of turning length, against 340 mm (13 in) and 330 mm (13 in) on the LYNX 2100 B
- 3,900 kg (8,598 lb), against 5,750 kg (12,677 lb) for the LYNX 2600 Y with the same Y stroke
Limitations
- Main spindle stops at 4,500 rpm; the 6 in LYNX 2100 A and LYNX 2100 LA reach 6,000 rpm
- The Y stroke of 105 mm (4 in) is about a third of the 300 mm (12 in) turning diameter, so off-centre features on large parts must be checked against it
- Turning diameter is 300 mm (12 in), below the 350 mm (14 in) of the turning-only LYNX 2100 B
- No power or torque figure is listed for the live-tool drive
- 3,900 kg (8,598 lb) is about 26% more than the 3,100 kg (6,834 lb) of the LYNX 2100 B
Best For
Frequently Asked Questions
01
105 mm (4 in), with 205 mm (8 in) of X travel and 560 mm (22 in) of Z travel. DN Solutions gives the Y figure as a total stroke and does not state how much of it lies above and below the spindle centreline, which matters when a feature sits far to one side. Ask for that split if the part has one.
02
The spindle figures match: an 8 in chuck, 4,500 rpm, 15 kW (20 hp) and 169 N·m (125 ft-lb). The LYNX 2100 B is a short two-axis lathe with 340 mm (13 in) of Z travel, a 350 mm (14 in) by 330 mm (13 in) turning envelope and a weight of 3,100 kg (6,834 lb). The LYNX 2100 LYB adds 105 mm (4 in) of Y travel and 6,000 rpm live tools, has 560 mm (22 in) of Z travel, turns 300 mm (12 in) by 510 mm (20 in) and weighs 3,900 kg (8,598 lb).
03
Decide on the blank. The LYNX 2600 Y has a 10 in chuck, 18.5 kW (25 hp), 403 N·m (297 ft-lb) and 3,500 rpm, turns 380 mm (15 in) by 610 mm (24 in) and weighs 5,750 kg (12,677 lb). The LYNX 2100 LYB is faster at 4,500 rpm, lighter at 3,900 kg (8,598 lb) and limited to 169 N·m (125 ft-lb) and a 300 mm (12 in) turning diameter. Y travel and live-tool speed are the same on both, so the milling side does not settle it.
04
The power and torque of the live-tool drive, which is listed only by its 6,000 rpm speed. The table also has no rapid rate for Y, no bar capacity or spindle bore, and no tailstock figures, although a 510 mm (20 in) turning length invites shaft work that may need support. Electrical and air requirements have to be requested as well.
05
The machine is 2,880 mm (113 in) long, 1,711 mm (67 in) wide and 1,921 mm (76 in) high, and it weighs 3,900 kg (8,598 lb). DN lists a rear-side double-purpose chip conveyor for the series, so allow access behind the machine in addition to the listed length and width.
Videos
DN Solutions_Official
Electronica HiTech Machine Tools Pvt. Ltd.
TP Products
Community Discussions
Troubleshooting and problem-solving
Links to community discussions. Summaries are editorial — visit the original thread for full context.


