Industrial CNC Machine Directory

Machine Comparison

Nakamura-Tome SC-300II vs Nakamura-Tome WT-150II

Nakamura-Tome vs Nakamura-Tome · CNC Lathes

01

Summary

The Nakamura-Tome SC-300II and Nakamura-Tome WT-150II are both from Nakamura-Tome's cnc lathes lineup, making this a common upgrade or lineup decision for shops already invested in the Nakamura-Tome ecosystem. These machines are closely matched across most specifications, making the decision more about specific feature priorities, dealer support, and your existing shop ecosystem than raw spec advantages. Both machines are proven performers in production environments and represent solid investments for shops in the market for a cnc lathe.

02

Specifications Comparison

Specification Nakamura-Tome SC-300II Nakamura-Tome WT-150II
Max Turning Diameter 360 mm (14.17 in) 200 mm (7.87 in)
Max Turning Length 635 mm (25 in) 350 mm (13.78 in)
Control Fanuc 0i-TF Plus Fanuc 31i-B
Price Range $250,000 - $350,000 $250,000 - $400,000 (new)
03

Advantages

Nakamura-Tome SC-300II

  • Superior max turning diameter at 360 mm (14.17 in) vs 200 mm (7.87 in)
  • Superior max turning length at 635 mm (25 in) vs 350 mm (13.78 in)
  • Backed by Nakamura-Tome's dealer and service network for parts and support
  • Production shops running complex turned parts with cross-holes, flats, and keyways that currently require two or more setups

Nakamura-Tome WT-150II

  • Backed by Nakamura-Tome's dealer and service network for parts and support
  • High-volume small-medium turned parts production
04

Verdict

This is a close matchup. The Nakamura-Tome SC-300II and Nakamura-Tome WT-150II trade advantages across different specifications, making neither a clear winner on paper alone. Your decision should come down to practical factors: which dealer is closer, which control system your operators already know, what tooling ecosystem you're invested in, and which machine's specific strengths match your highest-volume work. Get quotes on both, run test cuts with your actual parts if possible, and factor in long-term service and support costs.