Machine Comparison
Mazak INTEGREX AG vs Willemin-Macodel 408MT
Yamazaki Mazak vs Willemin-Macodel · Mill-Turn Machines
Summary
The Mazak INTEGREX AG from Yamazaki Mazak and Willemin-Macodel 408MT from Willemin-Macodel are direct competitors in the mill-turn machines category. These machines are closely matched across most specifications, making the decision more about specific feature priorities, dealer support, and your existing shop ecosystem than raw spec advantages. Both machines are proven performers in production environments and represent solid investments for shops in the market for a mill-turn machine.
Specifications Comparison
| Specification | Mazak INTEGREX AG | Willemin-Macodel 408MT |
|---|---|---|
| Tool Capacity | 36-72 tools by base platform | 36 tools |
| Control | MAZATROL SmoothAi CNC with gear machining cycles | Fanuc 31i-B5 |
| B Axis Range | 240° (-30° to +210°) on horizontal ▲ | +/-105 degrees |
| Milling Spindle Speed | 12,000 RPM (20,000 RPM optional on horizontal) | 40,000 rpm ▲ |
| Price Range | $350,000 - $1,200,000+ | $300,000 - $420,000 ▲ |
Advantages
Mazak INTEGREX AG
- Superior b axis range at 240° (-30° to +210°) on horizontal vs +/-105 degrees
- Backed by Yamazaki Mazak's dealer and service network for parts and support
- Automotive transmission manufacturers producing geared shafts and splined components
Willemin-Macodel 408MT
- Superior milling spindle speed at 40,000 rpm vs 12,000 RPM (20,000 RPM optional on horizontal)
- More competitive pricing at $300,000 - $420,000 compared to $350,000 - $1,200,000+
- Backed by Willemin-Macodel's dealer and service network for parts and support
- Medical device manufacturers producing dental abutments, spinal screws, bone screws, and micro-surgical instruments from bar stock
Verdict
This is a close matchup. The Mazak INTEGREX AG and Willemin-Macodel 408MT trade advantages across different specifications, making neither a clear winner on paper alone. Your decision should come down to practical factors: which dealer is closer, which control system your operators already know, what tooling ecosystem you're invested in, and which machine's specific strengths match your highest-volume work. Get quotes on both, run test cuts with your actual parts if possible, and factor in long-term service and support costs.