Machine Comparison
Mazak INTEGREX AG vs WFL M150
Yamazaki Mazak vs WFL · Mill-Turn Machines
Summary
The Mazak INTEGREX AG and the WFL M150 are both multi-tasking machines for complex parts, but they are aimed at different work. The INTEGREX AG builds gear machining cycles into the MAZATROL SmoothAi CNC for gears and splines; the WFL M150 is a long-bed mill-turn for shafts, rotors and landing gear, run on a Siemens SINUMERIK 840D sl with WFL MILLTURN PRO.
The WFL takes far longer parts, up to 12,000 mm (472.4 in) of turning length against 60.2″. The table lists the AG at Φ90.55″ turning diameter against Ø1,480 mm (58.3 in) on the WFL, and the AG's milling spindle runs at 12,000 RPM (20,000 RPM optional on horizontal) against 3,200/5,000/8,000 rpm. Magazines are 36-72 tools on the AG and 36/72/108 on the M150.
Specifications Comparison
| Specification | Mazak INTEGREX AG | WFL M150 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Turning Diameter | Φ90.55″ ▲ | Ø1,480 mm (58.3 in) |
| Max Turning Length | 60.2″ | Up to 12,000 mm (472.4 in) |
| Live Tool Speed | 12,000 RPM (20,000 RPM optional on horizontal) ▲ | 3,200/5,000/8,000 rpm |
| Tool Capacity | 36-72 tools by base platform | 36/72/108 |
Advantages
Mazak INTEGREX AG
- 12,000 RPM milling spindle (20,000 RPM optional) against 3,200/5,000/8,000 rpm
- Gear machining cycles for gears, splines and geared shafts
- Φ90.55″ maximum turning diameter against Ø1,480 mm (58.3 in)
WFL M150
- Turning length up to 12,000 mm (472.4 in) against 60.2″
- Siemens SINUMERIK 840D sl control with WFL MILLTURN PRO for long-shaft work
Verdict
Choose the Mazak INTEGREX AG when the parts are geared shafts, splined components or gearbox parts that should be finished, gears included, in one setup, and when 12,000 RPM milling suits the features. Choose the WFL M150 for long, heavy work such as turbine rotors, crankshafts, landing gear and downhole tools, where up to 12,000 mm of turning length and Siemens-based programming fit the job.