Machine Comparison
Mazak INTEGREX AG vs WFL M150
Yamazaki Mazak vs WFL · Mill-Turn Machines
Summary
The Mazak INTEGREX AG from Yamazaki Mazak and WFL M150 from WFL are direct competitors in the mill-turn machines category. The WFL M150 leads in tool capacity (Up to 120 tools vs 36-72 tools by base platform). These machines are closely matched across most specifications, making the decision more about specific feature priorities, dealer support, and your existing shop ecosystem than raw spec advantages. Both machines are proven performers in production environments and represent solid investments for shops in the market for a mill-turn machine.
Specifications Comparison
| Specification | Mazak INTEGREX AG | WFL M150 |
|---|---|---|
| Tool Capacity | 36-72 tools by base platform | Up to 120 tools ▲ |
| Control | MAZATROL SmoothAi CNC with gear machining cycles | Siemens SINUMERIK 840D sl with WFL MILLTURN PRO |
| B Axis Range | 240° (-30° to +210°) on horizontal ▲ | ±120° |
| Milling Spindle Speed | 12,000 RPM (20,000 RPM optional on horizontal) | 12,000 RPM |
| Milling Spindle Taper | HSK-A63 / Capto C6 / CAT 50 by platform | HSK-A100 |
| Price Range | $350,000 - $1,200,000+ ▲ | $1,500,000 - $3,000,000+ |
Advantages
Mazak INTEGREX AG
- Superior b axis range at 240° (-30° to +210°) on horizontal vs ±120°
- More competitive pricing at $350,000 - $1,200,000+ compared to $1,500,000 - $3,000,000+
- Backed by Yamazaki Mazak's dealer and service network for parts and support
- Automotive transmission manufacturers producing geared shafts and splined components
WFL M150
- Larger tool magazine with Up to 120 tools capacity reduces manual tool changes on complex parts
- Backed by WFL's dealer and service network for parts and support
- Aerospace manufacturers producing landing gear components, turbine shafts, and structural parts that require combined turning and 5-axis milling in a single setup
Verdict
This is a close matchup. The Mazak INTEGREX AG and WFL M150 trade advantages across different specifications, making neither a clear winner on paper alone. Your decision should come down to practical factors: which dealer is closer, which control system your operators already know, what tooling ecosystem you're invested in, and which machine's specific strengths match your highest-volume work. Get quotes on both, run test cuts with your actual parts if possible, and factor in long-term service and support costs.