Industrial CNC Machine Directory

Machine Comparison

Mazak INTEGREX AG vs Niles-Simmons N20 MC

Yamazaki Mazak vs Niles-Simmons · Mill-Turn Machines

01

Summary

The Mazak INTEGREX AG from Yamazaki Mazak and Niles-Simmons N20 MC from Niles-Simmons are direct competitors in the mill-turn machines category. These machines are closely matched across most specifications, making the decision more about specific feature priorities, dealer support, and your existing shop ecosystem than raw spec advantages. Both machines are proven performers in production environments and represent solid investments for shops in the market for a mill-turn machine.

02

Specifications Comparison

Specification Mazak INTEGREX AG Niles-Simmons N20 MC
Control MAZATROL SmoothAi CNC with gear machining cycles Siemens 840D SL
B Axis Range 240° (-30° to +210°) on horizontal +/-120 degrees
Milling Spindle Speed 12,000 RPM (20,000 RPM optional on horizontal) 12,000 rpm
Price Range $350,000 - $1,200,000+ $400,000 - $650,000
03

Advantages

Mazak INTEGREX AG

  • Superior b axis range at 240° (-30° to +210°) on horizontal vs +/-120 degrees
  • More competitive pricing at $350,000 - $1,200,000+ compared to $400,000 - $650,000
  • Backed by Yamazaki Mazak's dealer and service network for parts and support
  • Automotive transmission manufacturers producing geared shafts and splined components

Niles-Simmons N20 MC

  • Backed by Niles-Simmons's dealer and service network for parts and support
  • Aerospace manufacturers machining landing gear components, actuator shafts, and engine accessory parts in a single setup
04

Verdict

This is a close matchup. The Mazak INTEGREX AG and Niles-Simmons N20 MC trade advantages across different specifications, making neither a clear winner on paper alone. Your decision should come down to practical factors: which dealer is closer, which control system your operators already know, what tooling ecosystem you're invested in, and which machine's specific strengths match your highest-volume work. Get quotes on both, run test cuts with your actual parts if possible, and factor in long-term service and support costs.