Machine Comparison
Index G220 vs Mazak INTEGREX AG
Index-Traub vs Yamazaki Mazak · Mill-Turn Machines
Summary
The Index G220 from Index-Traub and Mazak INTEGREX AG from Yamazaki Mazak are direct competitors in the mill-turn machines category. These machines are closely matched across most specifications, making the decision more about specific feature priorities, dealer support, and your existing shop ecosystem than raw spec advantages. Both machines are proven performers in production environments and represent solid investments for shops in the market for a mill-turn machine.
Specifications Comparison
| Specification | Index G220 | Mazak INTEGREX AG |
|---|---|---|
| Control | Index C200-SL (Siemens 840D SL) | MAZATROL SmoothAi CNC with gear machining cycles |
| Milling Spindle Speed | 12,000 RPM | 12,000 RPM (20,000 RPM optional on horizontal) |
| Price Range | $450,000 - $650,000 (new) | $350,000 - $1,200,000+ ▲ |
Advantages
Index G220
- Backed by Index-Traub's dealer and service network for parts and support
- Aerospace manufacturers machining complex multi-feature parts requiring 3-4 setups currently
Mazak INTEGREX AG
- More competitive pricing at $350,000 - $1,200,000+ compared to $450,000 - $650,000 (new)
- Backed by Yamazaki Mazak's dealer and service network for parts and support
- Automotive transmission manufacturers producing geared shafts and splined components
Verdict
This is a close matchup. The Index G220 and Mazak INTEGREX AG trade advantages across different specifications, making neither a clear winner on paper alone. Your decision should come down to practical factors: which dealer is closer, which control system your operators already know, what tooling ecosystem you're invested in, and which machine's specific strengths match your highest-volume work. Get quotes on both, run test cuts with your actual parts if possible, and factor in long-term service and support costs.