Machine Comparison
Chiron DZ 22W vs Chiron MILL 8000
Chiron vs Chiron · Vertical Machining Centers
Summary
The Chiron DZ 22W and Chiron MILL 8000 are both from Chiron's vertical machining centers lineup, making this a common upgrade or lineup decision for shops already invested in the Chiron ecosystem. The Chiron MILL 8000 leads in x travel (Up to 8,000 mm (315 in) vs 620 mm (24.4 in)). The Chiron MILL 8000 leads in tool capacity (Up to 60 tools vs Up to 2 x 77 tools). The Chiron MILL 8000 shows specification advantages in 4 categories, though the Chiron DZ 22W may still be the better choice depending on your shop's specific needs and the type of work you run. Both machines are proven performers in production environments and represent solid investments for shops in the market for a vertical machining center.
Specifications Comparison
| Specification | Chiron DZ 22W | Chiron MILL 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| X-Axis Travel | 620 mm (24.4 in) | Up to 8,000 mm (315 in) ▲ |
| Y-Axis Travel | 650 mm (25.6 in) | 800 mm (31.5 in) ▲ |
| Z-Axis Travel | 600 mm (23.6 in) | 630 mm (24.8 in) ▲ |
| Max Spindle Speed | 20,000 RPM (high-speed) / 12,500 RPM (high-torque) | Up to 20,000 RPM |
| Tool Capacity | Up to 2 x 77 tools | Up to 60 tools ▲ |
| Control | Siemens 840D sl | Siemens SINUMERIK 840D sl |
| Price Range | $500,000 - $750,000 ▲ | $750,000 - $1,200,000 |
Advantages
Chiron DZ 22W
- More competitive pricing at $500,000 - $750,000 compared to $750,000 - $1,200,000
- Backed by Chiron's dealer and service network for parts and support
- Automotive production of cylinder heads, turbocharger housings, brake components, and transmission parts at high volumes
Chiron MILL 8000
- Greater x travel of Up to 8,000 mm (315 in) accommodates larger workpieces
- Greater y travel of 800 mm (31.5 in) accommodates larger workpieces
- Greater z travel of 630 mm (24.8 in) accommodates larger workpieces
- Larger tool magazine with Up to 60 tools capacity reduces manual tool changes on complex parts
Verdict
The Chiron MILL 8000 edges ahead on specifications in this comparison, particularly in X Travel and Y Travel. However, the Chiron DZ 22W remains competitive and may be the better choice depending on price, dealer support in your area, or specific workholding and tooling considerations. Both are capable machines — the best decision comes from running your actual parts and evaluating total cost of ownership including tooling, training, and service.